Introduction
Overview
Microporation Technology
MicroPorator vs. Electroporator
 
 

Home > Introduction > MicroPorator vs. Electroporator

MicroPorator vs. Electroporator
Feature MicroPorator A company B company C company D company
Device Technology Microporation Technology
Nucleofector Technology
Conventional electroporator
Conventional electroporator
Conventional electroporator
Transfection efficency +++ +++ + + +
Viability +++ +++ + + +
Nuclear delivery +++ +++ + + +
Graphic user interface Yes No No No No
Database Yes Yes - - -
Disposable Kit Sample volume 10/100uL 100 uL 100/200/400 uL
100/200/400 uL 100/200/400 uL
Electrode material +++
Gold coating
+
Aluminium
+
Aluminium
+
Aluminium
+
Aluminium
Buffer system Simple
(Single buffer system)
Complex
(Cell type dependent)
PBS (Normal buffer) PBS (Normal buffer) PBS (Normal buffer)
Test cost Low High Low Low Low
Easy to use Sample handling +++ +

+ + +
User optimization +++ +
Pre-defined (Closed)
+++ +++ +++
Cell database +++ +++ + + +
Application Cell type Eukaryote Eukaryote Eukaryote, Prokaryote Eukaryote, Prokaryote Eukaryote, Prokaryote
Primary cell, Stem cell, Blood cell +++ +++ + + +
Assays
(siRNA, Reporter assay etc.)
+++ +++ + + +
Cost Device Price
Middle
High
Middle
Low
Middle
  Disposable Price Very low Very high Low Low Low